DOCUMENT: RPT12COR.TXT


                     U N I T E D    N A T I O N S

     ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL                           Distr. 
     COUNCIL                                       GENERAL
     
     E/CN.4/Sub.2/1994/30/Corr.1                   ENGLISH ONLY
     7 September 1994                              GE.94-14273 (E)


     COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS 
     Sub-Commission on Prevention 
       of Discrimination and 
       Protection of Minorities 
     Forty-sixth session 
     Agenda item 15  
     
               DISCRIMINATION AGAINST INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
     
         Report of the Working Group on Indigenous Populations
                        on its twelfth session
     
                              CORRIGENDUM

     PARAGRAPH 41

     For the existing text, SUBSTITUTE  
     
     41.   The observer delegate for Brazil pointed out the 
     attention given to the draft declaration in his country, 
     particularly in the press. He expressed the opinion that, in 
     order to be universally acceptable, the draft declaration 
     should take into account INTER ALIA the diversity of situations 
     in which indigenous communities were found throughout the 
     world, as well as their different degrees of economic and 
     social development. He emphasized that, although the draft 
     declaration contained a great number of articles generally 
     considered to be positive, such as those relating to cultural 
     identity and indigenous development, some of its provisions 
     give rise to concern in their present formulation, and might 
     encounter difficulty in being accepted by many Governments. He 
     referred, in particular, to the provisions on the right to 
     self-determination, which were not, in their present 
     formulation,  consistent with constitutional and international 
     law practices. He also observed that the use of the words 
     "indigenous peoples" as the subjects of the rights contained in 
     the draft might lead to ambiguous interpretation, incompatible 
     with international law. He considered that further 
     clarification would also be required on the meaning and extent 
     of indigenous autonomy and self-government in matters relating 
     to their internal and local affairs, as well as on the concept 
     of demilitarization of indigenous lands and on access by 
     indigenous people to international procedures for conflict 
     resolution with States. He proposed that the expression "land, 
     territories and resources" be replaced by the words "land and 
     natural resources" in order better to reflect the diversity of 
     situations and indigenous tenure regimes throughout the world. 
     It was the view of his Government that the articles which were 
     intended to ensure indigenous people access to international 
     cooperation for environmental protection and improving the 
     productive capacity of their lands did not reflect adequately 
     the role as catalyst and the coordination role that must be 
     played by governmental agencies. In concluding, he said that 
     the declaration, when adopted in its final version, would 
     reflect an adequate balance between the aspirations of 
     indigenous people and the concerns of Governments in order to 
     be effective.  
     
     PAGE 17

     After paragraph 57, INSERT the following paragraph.  
     
          The observer for Brazil informed the Working Group that 
     the new Federal Law on Indigenous Societies in his country had 
     recently been approved by the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies and 
     was soon to be considered by the Senate for final adoption. 
     That new legislation envisaged the promotion of indigenous 
     participation in the decision-making process in matters which 
     affected the implementation of the right of indigenous 
     communities to benefit from the exploitation of natural 
     resources in their lands, including by regulating mining 
     activities on them, and the protection of intellectual property 
     rights of their traditional knowledge in order to ensure 
     compensation and sharing of benefits arising from the 
     sustainable utilization of that indigenous heritage.  
     
     PARAGRAPH 62 on page 17 should read:  
     
     62.   The observer for Brazil informed the Working Group of 
     recent developments concerning the Yanomami community. He 
     explained that, as a result of a series of conflicts involving 
     gold diggers and Indians, 16 Yanomamis had died and four others 
     had been injured in an incident that had occurred along the 
     border between Brazil and Venezuela. A bilateral committee had 
     been set up by the respective Governments to follow up measures 
     taken in both countries to inquire into the matter. As a result 
     of police investigations, five persons had been indicted and 
     charged with murder, illegal mining, smuggling, hiding corpses 
     and damaging indigenous patrimony. During the second meeting of 
     the ad hoc bilateral committee an IN SITU fact-finding mission 
     had taken place and special arrangements put in place to 
     facilitate the exchange of evidence allowing the prosecution of 
     the suspects. As a further step to protect the Yanomami and 
     other indigenous communities in the Amazon, the Brazilian 
     Government was implementing an extensive surveillance system to 
     control air traffic and prevent the invasion of indigenous 
     lands by gold diggers.  
     
     PARAGRAPH 76 
     
     REPLACE the words "indigenous lands" in the paragraph BY 
     "indigenous territories".  
     
     Paragraph 103 

     The paragraph SHOULD READ:  
     
          The observer delegate for Brazil expressed his 
     disappointment with the proposals contained in the report by 
     the Chairman of the Technical Meeting, many of which he 
     considered not to be action-orientated or directly related to 
     the goals set out for the Decade in resolution 48/163. His 
     Government expected a programme of action supportive of 
     sustainable development of indigenous populations. Although 
     some of the proposals constituted a useful basis for the 
     elaboration of specific agendas of action by the United Nations 
     system, he was concerned by the biased focus on building up a 
     network between the United Nations Secretariat and indigenous 
     communities, by-passing government channels. Among the thematic 
     areas proposed, the inclusion of polemic issues, such as "self-
     determination", did not help a constructive dialogue among 
     Governments and indigenous observers to devise pragmatic 
     projects for concrete action to benefit national indigenous 
     populations. He proposed that protection of the intellectual 
     property rights of indigenous knowledge be added to the list of 
     thematic projects. Lastly, he emphasized the importance of 
     bilateral cooperation, in particular financial and technical 
     cooperation, for the success of the International Decade.  
     
     PARAGRAPH 128 

     The paragraph SHOULD READ:  
     
          The observer for Uruguay made a statement on behalf of 
     Brazil, Nicaragua, Panama and his own country. He expressed the 
     view that the Working Group had established, throughout its 
     existence, a constructive framework for dialogue among its 
     members and observers from Governments and indigenous 
     populations. However, the legal basis for the convening of the 
     Working Group was that of an ad hoc group authorized annually 
     by its parent bodies. The Vienna Declaration and Programme of 
     Action, by recommending consideration of the possible 
     establishment of a permanent forum for indigenous people, had 
     given the opportunity to establish, on a permanent basis, the 
     positive experience of the Working Group. In that sense, the 
     possibility was open for broadening of its mandate, and 
     including new issues such as sustainable development, health 
     and economic activities. That would be in line with the goals 
     of the International Decade and it would allow the Working 
     Group to make recommendations, through appropriate channels, to 
     the relevant agencies of the United Nations system. In the view 
     of those countries, it might also be considered, in adopting a 
     decision to make the Working Group a permanent body, to 
     recognize, exceptionally, that indigenous observers did not 
     need to be accredited to the Economic and Social Council, 
     although their legitimate participation should be according to 
     criteria to be defined. 

   -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::     -= THE FOURTH WORLD DOCUMENTATION PROJECT =-      ::
::                 A service provided by                 ::
::        The Center For World Indigenous Studies        ::
::                      www.cwis.org                     ::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
  

 Originating at the Center for World Indigenous Studies, Olympia, 
 Washington USA www.cwis.org <http://www.cwis.org>
 
 � 1999 Center for World Indigenous Studies
 
 (All Rights Reserved. References up to 500 words must be referenced
 to the Center for World Indigenous Studies and/or the Author
 
 Copyright Policy
 
 Material appearing in the Fourth World Documentation Project Archive 
is accepted on the basis that the material is the original, unoccupied
work of the author or authors. Authors agree to indemnify the Center for
World Indigenous Studies, and DayKeeper Press for all damages, fines and
costs associated with a finding of copyright infringement by the author 
or by the Center for World Indigenous Studies Fourth World Documentation 
Project Archive in disseminating the author(s) material. In almost all 
cases material appearing in the Fourth World Documentation Project Archive
will attract copyright protection under the laws of the United States of 
America and the laws of countries which are member states of the Berne 
Convention, Universal Copyright Convention or have bi-lateral copyright
agreements with the United States of America. Ownership of such copyright
will vest by operation of law in the authors and/or The Center for World
Indigenous Studies, Fourth World Journal or DayKeeper Press. The Fourth 
World Documentation Project Archive and its authors grant a license to 
those accessing the Fourth World Documentation Project Archive to render 
copyright materials on their computer screens and to print out a single 
copy for their personal non-commercial use subject to proper attribution 
of the Center for World Indigenous Studies Fourth World Documentation 
Project Archive and/or the authors.
 
 Questions may be referred to: Director of Research
 Center for World Indigenous Studies
 PMB 214
 1001 Cooper Point RD SW Suite 140
 Olympia, Washington 98502-1107 USA
 360-754-1990
 www.cwis.org <http://www.cwis.org>
 usaoffice@cwis.org <mailto:usaoffice@cwis.org>
 
 OCR Software provided by Caere Corporation